Meeting the targeted climate will require significant removal of carbon dioxide in addition to reducing emissions. To achieve this in a sustainable manner, a variety of approaches are needed to avoid adverse outcomes and to compare the benefits associated with local needs. In 2015, governments around the world signed the Paris Agreement, with the aim of reducing global warming to below 2°C, and preferably below 1.5°C. Since then, greenhouse gases have continued to rise. However, new national commitments made at last year’s COPmeeting can still keep us below. While this offers a place of hope, turning these promises into reality remains a challenge, and the promises will have to move forward to close to 1.5 ° C. Reducing carbon emissions will not be enough. Mitigation measures that are in line with these objectives will require the use of carbon dioxide emission strategies, but this will require continuous operation and other important activities such as agriculture and biodiversity conservation.
Why Is It Important To Reduce Carbon Emissions?
Reducing carbon emissions is important because they can help eliminate the harmful effects of high levels of CO2 in our environment. Reducing carbon emissions can:
•Save lives: Air pollution levels can have a detrimental effect on our health, leading to chronic health conditions and premature death. According to researchers, low blood pressure caused by carbon dioxide can cause heart disease, stroke, lung disease, high blood pressure and even diabetes. According to scientists, reducing carbon emissions will have a positive effect on air quality and prevent thousands of premature deaths.
•Simplify the burden of the health care system: Poor air quality exacerbates health issues in people with chronic conditions, which increases the frequency of their health visits, which can seriously burden the health care system. Taking steps to reduce these discharges makes it easier for health care providers to treat those who need help.
•Reduce wildfires: Wildfires and carbon emissions are part of a dangerous cycle. Wildfires emit dangerous amounts of carbon emissions, and rising carbon emissions cause extreme weather conditions such as heat waves, which often contribute to fires. Reducing our emissions could relieve some of the burden from forest and land management, paramedics, and fire departments around the world.
Carbon dioxide removal can not replace significant emissions reductions, but it can help eliminate carbon emissions that are difficult to eliminate completely, and allow countries to gain net-zero faster. The release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere can be achieved by developing biological, geochemical, or chemical satellites. There is a lack of ideas on how to do this. However, in large quantities, many approaches place great demands on natural resources.
The successful implementation of any method of carbon dioxide removal will require careful consideration of other land use requirements. Reforestation and improved forest management are well-established ways to conserve carbon and enhance biodiversity, but benefits are hampered by land availability. About half of the world’s population is currently committed to the agriculture needed to feed the growing population. Another way to increase capacity is to use agroforestry, where trees are put into agriculture so that the earth can support food production, carbon dioxide, and biodiversity. However, this requires professional management and can lead to the trade and production of plants.
The expansion of the tree cover can contribute to the removal of carbon dioxide, but we cannot rely solely on this in view of space constraints. Another promising option is to accelerate the natural climate of silicate rocks, a process that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This can be achieved by distributing crushed silicate stones over arable land, avoiding additional local requirements. In an article released this month, Beerling and colleagues suggested that implementing the strategy in the UK could bring up to 45% of the carbon dioxide emissions needed for the country to achieve net-zero by 2050. In addition, they show that the rock has improved. climate can benefit agriculture by reducing soil acidity and reducing the need for fertilizer. Collaborative benefits such as these can help promote delivery, and ensure long-term recovery.
There are many types of carbon dioxide alternatives available, from wetland recycling to direct emission of carbon dioxide into the air by facilitating chemical reactions. Each method offers different benefits, as well as its own challenges. While many strategies have been shown to be technically feasible, few have been proven to be effective or widely accepted. Efforts to accelerate the development of immature technology will be needed to maximize the options available to us.
It must also be carefully considered the potential unintended consequences. For example, changes in forest cover can directly affect rainand higher temperatures by adjusting local variability. And in this case, in the article Van Dijke and colleagues point out that implementing the replacement of a large tree could lead to significant changes in water availability in the region around the world. These direct influences on the local climate downstream can be beneficial or harmful depending on the area. Marine-based strategies, such as ocean fertilization, can be complex and difficult to predict impacts on marine ecosystem. Complete monitoring of carbon removal technology will be required to measure their long-term efficiency, as well as any environmental impacts.
Carbon dioxide removal will likely be important in the coming years in the fight against climate change. Successful implementation will depend on having many advanced options available. This will enable the use of appropriate methods and technologies in the right areas to maximize the combined benefits and minimize adverse environmental impacts.
For More Read: Catching carbon, Editorial, Nat. Geosci. 15, 341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00951-0 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-022-00951-0
READ ALSO : Common Entrance Test is a path-breaking to bring “Ease of Recruitment”: Dr Jitendra Singh
